Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were the perpetrators of the Columbine High School massacre in 1999, one of the deadliest school shootings in American history. It is important to remember that diagnosing mental health conditions, especially posthumously, is a complex task that should be left to mental health professionals who have access to extensive information and assessments of the individuals in question.
From the information available, it is known that Eric Harris displayed a range of traits and behaviors consistent with psychopathy, including a lack of empathy, manipulative tendencies, and a disregard for others' rights and feelings. He was described as having a charismatic and manipulative personality, which allowed him to influence others, including Dylan Klebold, who was his close friend.
Dylan Klebold, on the other hand, was reportedly struggling with depression and feelings of isolation. While some reports suggest that he had a lower profile compared to Eric Harris, it is essential to recognize that depression, like any mental health condition, can have varying levels of severity and impact on an individual's behavior.
Regarding whether Dylan Klebold was manipulated by Eric Harris, it is a topic that has been debated by experts and researchers. There is evidence to suggest that Harris was the more dominant and influential figure in their partnership, but it is challenging to ascertain the exact dynamics of their relationship. Some experts believe that Klebold might have been more vulnerable and susceptible to Harris' influence due to his emotional struggles and desire for connection and acceptance.
It's crucial to avoid oversimplifying the complex factors that contribute to such tragic events. Mass shootings involve a combination of individual psychological factors, social dynamics, access to weapons, and systemic issues that create a unique and devastating outcome.
To understand the reasons behind such events fully, researchers, investigators, and mental health professionals carefully examine multiple factors and conduct in-depth analyses. It is essential to approach this topic with sensitivity and recognize that each case is unique, with multiple influences and risk factors at play.